Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Cosmos-Reason2-2B scores 59.5 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a small local model to reason over camera footage and images for robotics, driving or smart spaces
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 50
Watch for
Gated behind a click-through licence that needs a Hugging Face account
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 65
- Agent interface, 75 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 39
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cosmos-Reason2-2B | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 95 | LFM2.5-2.6B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 50 | Cosmos-Reason2-2B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 75 | LFM2.5-2.6B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 39 | 57 | LFM2.5-2.6B +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.5/100 | D 51.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cosmos-Reason2-2B | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | NVIDIA Open Model License (custom, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence); built on Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct under Apache 2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-03-10 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Cosmos-Reason2-2B
A small local cousin for reasoning over video and images in robotics, driving and warehouse scenes, returning points, boxes and timed events as JSON. The 4.9 GB file runs in Transformers or vLLM, though NVIDIA asks for 24 GB of GPU memory. Development has moved to Cosmos 3, and the gated licence is revocable.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Accept the licence on the Hugging Face card with a signed-in account and set HF_TOKEN before downloading
- Serve it with
vllm serve nvidia/Cosmos-Reason2-2B --max-model-len 16384 --media-io-kwargs '{"video": {"num_frames": -1}}' --reasoning-parser qwen3, keeping max-model-len between 8,192 and 16,384 as NVIDIA advises - For local video or images, make a folder for them (
mkdir -p media) and pass--allowed-local-media-path "$(pwd)/media", so the server can read only that folder, not everything under the directory you start it from - Sample video at 4 fps and allow at least 4,096 output tokens so the reasoning isn't cut off
- For reasoning, add the card's instruction to answer with a think block and then the answer; leave it out for a direct reply
- Use NVIDIA's prompt files (prompts/*.yaml in nvidia-cosmos/cosmos-reason2) when you want JSON boxes, events or trajectories, and validate the JSON yourself
- Check its plans before a robot acts on them, since NVIDIA's own safety card warns of collision and manipulation risks
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cosmos-Reason2-2B or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Cosmos-Reason2-2B scores 59.5 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Cosmos-Reason2-2B or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Hy3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling-Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kolibri-1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna M.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cosmos-reason2-2b-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cosmos-reason2-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cosmos-reason2-2b lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cosmos-reason2-2b", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key