Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 scores 53.5 (D) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3504 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 55
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 45
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Best for Pipelines with an NVIDIA GPU that need long scanned or rendered documents parsed in one pass, with page order, cross-page tables and boxes kept
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Loading runs Baidu's code, remote code in Transformers or a prebuilt SGLang fork from the repository, and the save_results path calls eval on model output
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 55 | LFM2.5-2.6B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | LFM2.5-2.6B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 45 | LFM2.5-2.6B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.5/100 | D 53.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Baidu |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | MIT (Hub metadata; the Hugging Face repository has no LICENSE file, and the GitHub code repository's LICENSE is the MIT text, copyright 2026 Baidu) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-26 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
A small MIT document-parsing cousin that reads up to hundreds of pages in one request and returns ordered layout blocks with boxes and HTML tables. It needs an NVIDIA GPU with about 12 GB, through Baidu's remote code or its own SGLang build. The risks are running the publisher's code and accuracy figures that are Baidu's own.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Quickest local run,
pip install torch==2.13.0 torchvision pillow transformers==4.52.1 huggingface-hub==0.36.0 tokenizers==0.21.4 addict==2.4.0 einops==0.8.2 easydict==1.13, thenAutoModel.from_pretrained("baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2", trust_remote_code=True, use_safetensors=True, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16).eval().cuda()andmodel.infer_multi(tokenizer, image_files=pages, output_path="out") - To serve it, download the repository, install
wheel/sglang-0.5.20.dev10+g8d62f5fb9c-py3-none-any.whlwith pymupdf and fastokens in a Python 3.10 venv, and startpython -m sglang.launch_server --model-path baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2 --chat-template unlimited-ocr --enable-custom-logit-processor --enable-streaming-session --disable-radix-cache --mem-fraction-static 0.7 --max-prefill-tokens 2048with the SGLANG_UOCR_ variables from the card - Send all pages of a document in one request, images first, then the text
<PAGE><image>repeated per page andMulti page parsing., with temperature 0, skip_special_tokens false, max_tokens of about 8,000 per page and the DeepseekOCRNoRepeatNGramLogitProcessor (ngram_size 35, window_size 1024 for several pages) - The output is layout blocks, not Markdown; run
utils/process_unlimitedOCR2.pyfrom github.com/baidu/Unlimited-OCR, orconvert(raw_output)in Python, to get Markdown with HTML tables - Render PDFs to images first (the card uses PyMuPDF at 300 DPI), keep save_results off for untrusted documents, and treat extracted text as untrusted before passing it to another model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2?
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 scores 53.5 (D) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- occamy-1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Recursive Flint vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-unlimited-ocr-2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/unlimited-ocr-2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b unlimited-ocr-2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "unlimited-ocr-2"}at/mcp, no key