Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Laguna XS 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a fast local coding model on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, with tool calling and a permissive licence.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any discussion, including reports about the tokenizer and remote code
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 46
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna XS 2.1 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 95 | LFM2.5-2.6B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna XS 2.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Laguna XS 2.1 +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 57 | LFM2.5-2.6B +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 51.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna XS 2.1 | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna XS 2.1
A small coding and agent cousin with 3B active parameters, so it's quick on modest hardware. Poolside's 4-bit GGUF, also Ollama's default, needs about 24 GB, and every major runtime runs it. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its discussions, there are no safety results, and the SGLang route runs repository code.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Laguna XS 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-xs-2.1, 20 GB of files, the same Q4_K_M as Poolside's GGUF - On our reference machine use
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 131072, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it), or BF16 with vLLM (66.9 GB) - With vLLM use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on a build with vllm-project/vllm#47311, or--tool-call-parser glm47on older builds - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The card warns that Ollama on Apple Silicon may return empty output until llama.cpp#25389 ships
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna XS 2.1 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Laguna XS 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna XS 2.1 or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-xs-2-1-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-xs-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-xs-2-1 lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-xs-2-1", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key