Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
Laguna XS 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a fast local coding model on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, with tool calling and a permissive licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 46 against 36
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any discussion, including reports about the tokenizer and remote code
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna XS 2.1 | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 65 | Laguna XS 2.1 +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna XS 2.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 36 | Laguna XS 2.1 +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna XS 2.1 | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna XS 2.1
A small coding and agent cousin with 3B active parameters, so it's quick on modest hardware. Poolside's 4-bit GGUF, also Ollama's default, needs about 24 GB, and every major runtime runs it. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its discussions, there are no safety results, and the SGLang route runs repository code.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
Laguna XS 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-xs-2.1, 20 GB of files, the same Q4_K_M as Poolside's GGUF - On our reference machine use
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 131072, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it), or BF16 with vLLM (66.9 GB) - With vLLM use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on a build with vllm-project/vllm#47311, or--tool-call-parser glm47on older builds - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The card warns that Ollama on Apple Silicon may return empty output until llama.cpp#25389 ships
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna XS 2.1 or Ornith-1.5-397B?
Laguna XS 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Laguna XS 2.1 or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-xs-2-1-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-xs-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-xs-2-1 ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-xs-2-1", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key