Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 36
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95
Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Ornith-1.5-397B 65
Memory 0, since the smallest 4-bit build, Ollama's at 242 GB, needs about 290 GB with the fifth added, above the 256 GB band, and Ornith's own Q4_K_M GGUF and NVFP4 builds need about the same. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.19.1, SGLang 0.5.9, Transformers 5.8.1, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture and Ollama's library, while LM Studio's entry is the base's. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4 and GGUF at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata on 21 October 2026, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it.
Agent interface Ornith-1.5-397B +15
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows tools declared in the OpenAI tools array in a request to Transformers' server, but not how a call comes back, and names no parser for vLLM or SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one assistant turn, and the card gives a tool-calling request as a supported use. Structured output 0, Neither JSON nor JSON Schema output is documented or claimed for the model on the card. Reasoning control 10, the card passes enable_thinking per request in its examples, the template has been off by default since 19 October 2026, and the GGUF repository keeps thinking builds in their own folder. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, max_position_embeddings in the text config. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 70.
Ornith-1.5-397B 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card shows how tools go in and how calls come back and names the parser for vLLM and SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, Ornith trains it on agent tasks and the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, Ornith's template turns thinking off per request with enable_thinking set to false and the card says the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content, though the card doesn't name the switch. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +12
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48
Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Ornith-1.5-397B 36
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 20, Ornith uploaded new shards to the NVFP4 build on 20 October 2026. Responsiveness 0, nobody from Ornith answered either of the 2 questions, or any of the six on its GGUF and NVFP4 builds. Version policy 0, every GGUF file and the NVFP4 shards were replaced in place in August with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE, the two chat templates differ, and the NVFP4 build carries shards its index doesn't use.
Risk MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +5
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55
File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main repository. Provenance 15, files in the openbmb organisation that OpenBMB's GitHub README links to (10), with a SHA-256 for both large files in the main repository (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or disclaimer section, and no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy or statement of trained refusals. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, nothing is added on the card, and the LICENSE in OpenBMB's GitHub repository resolved on 10 November 2026. Security programme 0, no SECURITY.md in OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V and no security.txt on openbmb.cn (both 404 on 10 November 2026), and no advisories found. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Ornith-1.5-397B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 65 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-397B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 36 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's largest coding and terminal-agent model, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risks are a missing licence file, no safety results, no publisher replies and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Ornith-1.5-397B?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-1b ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-1b", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key