Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 75
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for Agents on a 128 GB unified machine or Blackwell GPUs that want a long-context, tool-calling reasoning model with documented training data
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 48
Watch for
The card's serving commands pass --trust-remote-code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +22
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48
Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 70
The model card earns 20, all seven items with limitations in the linked subcard. Training data earns 20, datasets listed with sources and token counts and the corpora published. Last change earns 20, counting NVIDIA's own inference code for the model, as on Nemotron 3 Ultra and Nano. The repositories last changed with a card edit on 25 August 2026, but NVIDIA's TensorRT-LLM, which the card's serving commands use, changed its Nemotron-H model code on 14 October, 18 days ago. Responsiveness earns 0, with no NVIDIA reply in any of the nine discussions, re-counted on 1 November. Version policy earns 5 as a first release. File health earns 5, since a generation report waits without a reply and one card link is dead. 20+20+20+0+5+5 = 70.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +20
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95
Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 75
Memory earns 10, because the smallest 4-bit build, NVIDIA's 80.3 GB NVFP4, needs about 96 GB with the fifth added, which fits the reference machine but not 64 GB, and Ollama's 87 GB build lands in the same band. Runtimes earn the full 25 from released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Ollama. Builds earn 15 for NVIDIA's own FP8 and NVFP4. Terms earn 10, since the Nemotron licence is custom even though it's free for commercial use with no threshold or use policy. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 5, since NVIDIA's own API serves it.
Agent interface Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +20
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows tools declared in the OpenAI tools array in a request to Transformers' server, but not how a call comes back, and names no parser for vLLM or SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one assistant turn, and the card gives a tool-calling request as a supported use. Structured output 0, Neither JSON nor JSON Schema output is documented or claimed for the model on the card. Reasoning control 10, the card passes enable_thinking per request in its examples, the template has been off by default since 19 October 2026, and the GGUF repository keeps thinking builds in their own folder. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, max_position_embeddings in the text config. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 70.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 90
The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, since NVIDIA documents the format, names the qwen3_coder parser for three runtimes and shows a tool call in its cookbook. Trained tool calling earns 20, with tool-use reinforcement learning and several calls per turn in the template. Structured output earns 5, claimed from training with no instructions. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off, low effort or a budget per request with the trace returned as reasoning_content. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens in the config and up to 1M per the card.
Risk Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +10
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55
File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main repository. Provenance 15, files in the openbmb organisation that OpenBMB's GitHub README links to (10), with a SHA-256 for both large files in the main repository (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or disclaimer section, and no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy or statement of trained refusals. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, nothing is added on the card, and the LICENSE in OpenBMB's GitHub repository resolved on 10 November 2026. Security programme 0, no SECURITY.md in OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V and no security.txt on openbmb.cn (both 404 on 10 November 2026), and no advisories found. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 65
File safety earns 15, safetensors only but with 10 off because the documented serving commands pass trust-remote-code and the repository ships model and parser code. Provenance earns 15, files in NVIDIA's linked organisation with a hash for every file. Safety evaluation earns 0, since NVIDIA says it evaluated content safety but publishes no results. Agent guidance earns 10, a subcard that names prompt injection and says what safeguards to add, without an instruction hierarchy or concrete mitigations. Licence risk keeps all 15. The security programme earns 10 for the vulnerability submission route on the card and NVIDIA's public bulletins.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 75 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 70 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 66.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-03-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
A long-context agent cousin with trained parallel tool calls, a reasoning switch and a full account of its training data, under a free commercial licence. It needs about 100 GB of GPU memory, a 128 GB unified machine or Blackwell hardware for NVIDIA's NVFP4. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code and no published safety results.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- On the reference machine start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-super, the 87 GB q4_K_M build, the only one that fits (about 104 GB with the margin) - Raise the Strix Halo GPU memory limit first with
amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is far below what it needs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95for every task, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking: falseorlow_effort: trueinchat_template_kwargsfor short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Raise context past 262,144 only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576)
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Arete-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-1b nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-1b", "b": "nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b"}at/mcp, no key