Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.5 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 34
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for Agents that want a small multimodal tool-calling model on a laptop or a 16 GB GPU, under a plain licence
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No quantised build from Qwen itself
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +14
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48
Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Qwen3.5-9B 34
Model card 14, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters, context and 201 languages but gives no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general line about trillions of multimodal tokens with no cut-off. Last change 5, the files and card last changed on 2 March 2026 (c202236), 247 days before 4 November, within a year. Responsiveness 0, no Qwen member replied in any of the 40 most recent of the 45 discussions that aren't pull requests (2 March to 29 September 2026). Version policy 5, a first release that was never replaced in place, with no dated notes across generations. File health 5, two reports about the files and card (15 and 51) are still open with no reply. 14 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 34. The card's highlights mention sparse Mixture-of-Experts for the series while this 9B is dense, but its own overview matches config.json, so it's not counted as a contradiction.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95
Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Qwen3.5-9B 85
Memory 30, Qwen publishes no quantised 9B, so the smallest 4-bit build from a runtime's own library is Ollama's qwen3.5:9b at 6.6 GB, about 7.9 GB with the fifth added, well under 16 GB. Runtimes 25, the cap, with vLLM listed in its stable docs, Transformers at released tags, llama.cpp, Ollama's library, LM Studio's own catalogue and SGLang all running the architecture. Builds 0, Qwen's FP8 and GPTQ repositories cover only the 27B and larger Qwen3.5 models, so every quantisation of the 9B is someone else's. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0. Download 10, the repository isn't gated. Hosted 5, Together, Featherless AI, OVHcloud and DeepInfra are live for it on its Hugging Face page. 30 + 25 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Qwen3.5-9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 85 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 34 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 60.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.
Qwen3.5-9B
A small dense vision-language model with trained tool calling, thinking that turns off per request and a 262,144-token context. Ollama's 4-bit build is 6.6 GB and the BF16 files 19.3 GB, and every major runtime loads it. The files haven't changed since 2 March 2026, Qwen answered none of the 40 latest discussions, and no safety results are published.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.5-9B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:9b(6.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM run
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, or tool calls come back as text - Tool calls use the XML style
<tool_call><function=name><parameter=x>, not Hermes JSON, so use the qwen3_coder parser and not hermes - Thinking is on by default; pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since/nothinkisn't supported - There's no generation_config.json, so pass sampling yourself, temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5 when thinking, or 0.7, 0.8, 20, 1.5 without
- Keep at least 128K of context when thinking, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.5-9B?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.5 (C).
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-qwen3-5-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-1b qwen3-5-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-1b", "b": "qwen3-5-9b"}at/mcp, no key