Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.8 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 36
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server or a 128 GB Mac who want Qwen's newest sparse architecture for agentic coding and multimodal work, and aren't a hosted-model or coding-assistant business.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No build fits the reference machine's 107.4 GB, and Ollama's smallest Linux build is 120 GB
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95
Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 65
Memory 5 of 30, the smallest listed 4-bit build is Ollama's 120 GB q4_K_M, 144 GB with a fifth added, which is beyond the reference machine and inside 256 GB. Ollama's Apple-only 105 GB MLX build isn't among the builds and would land in the same band. Runtimes 25, released versions of llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the qwen4_exp architecture. Builds 10 of 15, Alibaba's only quantised build is FP8. Terms 10 of 15, a custom licence that's free for commercial use except for model-as-a-service and coding or office assistant businesses, which need a separate licence. Download 10, neither repository is gated. Hosted 5, Hugging Face lists two live providers, Featherless AI for the BF16 repository and Nscale for the FP8 build, and Alibaba's Qwen Cloud serves Qwen3.8-Flash, which the card says is based on these weights.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +12
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48
Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 36
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, architecture, parameters and context are there, but limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off aren't. Training data 0, not described beyond a token count relative to an earlier model. Last change 15, the FP8 config fix on 31 August 2026, 63 days before 2 November. Responsiveness 0, Qwen answered none of the 40 most recent questions and reports (29 to 79, 27 August to 26 October), its only reply came in the first week. Version policy 5, a first release with nothing replaced. File health 5, the files agree with the card, but a 19 October report about the template and a pull request to fix it still wait without a reply. 11 + 0 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 36.
Risk MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55
File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main repository. Provenance 15, files in the openbmb organisation that OpenBMB's GitHub README links to (10), with a SHA-256 for both large files in the main repository (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or disclaimer section, and no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy or statement of trained refusals. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, nothing is added on the card, and the LICENSE in OpenBMB's GitHub repository resolved on 10 November 2026. Security programme 0, no SECURITY.md in OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V and no security.txt on openbmb.cn (both 404 on 10 November 2026), and no advisories found. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 45
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts. Provenance 15, the files are in the Qwen organisation that Qwen's GitHub links to, and every file has a checksum. Safety evaluation 0, none published on the card or in the technical report. Agent guidance 0, nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 5 of 15, 5 off for the field-of-use limit on model-as-a-service and coding or office assistant businesses and 5 off for the naming duty above a user or revenue threshold. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact for Qwen was found, and Alibaba's group security centre couldn't be checked, so it's scored as absent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 65 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 45 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 36 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Qwen Community License 1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence). Free of charge, the model name shown in products above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue, and a separate licence from Qwen before commercial use by a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A large sparse cousin with 6B active parameters for agentic coding and multimodal work, previewing Qwen's next architecture. It needs a 128 GB Mac for Ollama's MLX build or about 144 GB for the 4-bit GGUF, and Qwen Cloud serves it. The main risk is a licence that needs a separate deal for hosted-model and coding or office assistant businesses.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a 128 GB Mac start it with
ollama run qwen3.8-flash-next:125b-mlx(105 GB, NVFP4), on Linux the smallest Ollama build isqwen3.8-flash-next:125b-a6b-q4_K_Mat 120 GB, which won't fit a 107.4 GB GPU share - On a server,
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser, as Qwen's GitHub README does
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to skip it, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content, even though SGLang's cookbook says thinking can't be turned off reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Send at most one system message and put it first, since the template raises an error otherwise
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- vLLM keeps the 51B n-gram table in host memory on 80 GB GPUs by default, per its recipe
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Qwen Community License before serving it to others as an API or inside a coding or office assistant product
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.8 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-1b qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-1b", "b": "qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key