Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a GPU server, or a provider account, that want an open agent model with a very long context
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 59 against 48
Watch for
178 GB at 4 bits, so it needs about 200 GB of memory
Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 45
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 65
Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits or better is ggml-org's MXFP4 GGUF, 168.93 GB with its projector, and 168.93 GB × 1.2 = 202.7 GB, within 256 GB. Xiaomi's own files are 177.74 GB. ggml-org's Q2_K is below 4 bits and isn't read. Runtimes 20, Released vLLM 0.33.0 and SGLang 0.5.23 have the mimo_v2 model and the mimo parsers, Transformers 5.22.2 has a mimo_v2_flash model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with a GGUF from its own organisation. Builds 10, one precision from Xiaomi, the 4-bit files it releases. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, an OSI licence. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, the card says it is on Xiaomi's MiMo Open Platform API and on OpenRouter, and Novita is live for it on Hugging Face. 5 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 65.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95
Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Agent interface MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +15
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (3,868 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card names the parser to use in two runtimes: the mimo tool-call parser in SGLang and in vLLM, with auto tool choice, and both ship it in a release. Trained tool calling 20, the card describes reinforcement learning on coding and general agent tasks across several harnesses, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the template has an enable_thinking switch and keeps reasoning_content, and the card names the mimo reasoning parser for SGLang and vLLM, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 1M tokens per the card's model summary, and 1,048,576 positions in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows tools declared in the OpenAI tools array in a request to Transformers' server, but not how a call comes back, and names no parser for vLLM or SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one assistant turn, and the card gives a tool-calling request as a supported use. Structured output 0, Neither JSON nor JSON Schema output is documented or claimed for the model on the card. Reasoning control 10, the card passes enable_thinking per request in its examples, the template has been off by default since 19 October 2026, and the GGUF repository keeps thinking builds in their own folder. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, max_position_embeddings in the text config. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 70.
Documentation and upkeep MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +11
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 59
Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, A description of the training method with no data sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commits, on 28 October 2026, updated the card, 13 days before this check. Responsiveness 5, Of the 13 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (21 September to 6 November 2026), 3 have a reply from a XiaomiMiMo member, which is a few. Version policy 5, MiMo-V2.5 stays in its own repositories and V2.6 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older cards that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 1M context, and two early faults (invalid JSON in the draft model's config, preprocessor values) were fixed in commits that say so. 14 + 5 + 20 + 5 + 5 + 10 = 59.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48
Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Risk MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 45
File safety 5, the weights are safetensors, but the dflash folder's mask_embedding.pt is a pickle beside them (15). Provenance 15, the files sit in the XiaomiMiMo organisation, which mimo.xiaomi.com links to per the Distill listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions only. Licence risk 15, MIT has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 5, Xiaomi runs a company security centre for reporting flaws, as read for the Distill listing (5). 5 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 45.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55
File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main repository. Provenance 15, files in the openbmb organisation that OpenBMB's GitHub README links to (10), with a SHA-256 for both large files in the main repository (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or disclaimer section, and no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy or statement of trained refusals. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, nothing is added on the card, and the LICENSE in OpenBMB's GitHub repository resolved on 10 November 2026. Security programme 0, no SECURITY.md in OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V and no security.txt on openbmb.cn (both 404 on 10 November 2026), and no advisories found. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 95 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 55 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 59 | 48 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Xiaomi (MiMo team) | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
Verdicts
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
A large agent model with an open licence: text, images, video and audio, a 1M context, tool calling it was trained for, and code in four released runtimes. It's a server model, 178 GB at 4 bits, and the card's commands run the repository's code. No safety results, little said about data, and few questions answered.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.
Before you call either
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Plan for a provider unless you have a multi-GPU server: Xiaomi's API platform, OpenRouter or Novita
- On SGLang or vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser mimo --reasoning-parser mimo - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95, as the card recommends
- The card's commands pass trust-remote-code. Read the repository's three Python files first, or use Transformers 5.22.2, which has the model built in
- Skip the dflash folder unless you need speculative decoding. Its mask_embedding.pt is a pickle
- The Use Restrictions section asks for human oversight of high-risk actions
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL or MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL or MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Arete-27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Mistral Large 4
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mimo-v2-6-flash-rl minicpm-v-4-7-1b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mimo-v2-6-flash-rl", "b": "minicpm-v-4-7-1b"}at/mcp, no key