# MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~10,200 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL: C 61, rank #75 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL, good for Teams with a GPU server, or a provider account, that want an open agent model with a very long context Ahead on Agent interface, 85 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 59 against 48.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model Ahead on Reach, 95 against 65; Risk, 55 against 45.

| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 65 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 45 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 59 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Xiaomi (MiMo team) | OpenBMB |
| Licence | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-30 |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +30: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 65 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits or better is ggml-org's MXFP4 GGUF, 168.93 GB with its projector, and 168.93 GB × 1.2 = 202.7 GB, within 256 GB.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95 (Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare.)
- Agent interface, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +15: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (3,868 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +11: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 59 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48 (Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and p…)
- Risk, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 45 (File safety 5, the weights are safetensors, but the dflash folder's mask_embedding.pt is a pickle beside them (15).); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)