Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 80
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 37
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba and no inference provider found
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +15
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95
Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 80
Memory earns the full 30, since LM Studio's Q4_K_M build with its projector is 0.73 GB (0.88 GB with the fifth added) and Ollama's Q8_0 build was 1.0 GB, both far within 16 GB. Alibaba publishes no quantised 0.8B, so builds scores 0. Runtimes reach the 25 cap on llama.cpp, Ollama (through its pinned llama.cpp), vLLM, SGLang, LM Studio and Transformers. Apache 2.0 with nothing added gives terms 15 and the ungated repository download 10. Hosted too scores 0, as the Hub maps no inference provider to this size. 30+25+0+15+10+0 = 80.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +11
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48
Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 37
The card covers six of the seven items, missing only a cut-off (17), because it states the intended uses and warns about thinking loops. Training data is a general description without a cut-off (5). The files last changed on 2 March 2026, 248 days before this check, within a year (5). No Qwen member has answered any of the 15 discussions that aren't pull requests (0). Qwen3-0.6B stays in its own repository without a dated note (5), and a template fix and the missing generation_config.json wait unanswered (5). 17+5+5+0+5+5 = 37.
Agent interface MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows tools declared in the OpenAI tools array in a request to Transformers' server, but not how a call comes back, and names no parser for vLLM or SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one assistant turn, and the card gives a tool-calling request as a supported use. Structured output 0, Neither JSON nor JSON Schema output is documented or claimed for the model on the card. Reasoning control 10, the card passes enable_thinking per request in its examples, the template has been off by default since 19 October 2026, and the GGUF repository keeps thinking builds in their own folder. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, max_position_embeddings in the text config. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 70.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 60
The template ships in the repository (20) and the model was trained for tool use with several calls per turn in the template (20). Tool-calling format gets 10, because the card names the qwen3_coder parser but leaves the format to the template. Reasoning control scores 0, since the card shows how to turn thinking on but not where the reasoning comes back. 262,144 tokens is native (10). Structured output scores 0, as nothing documents JSON output for the model. 20+10+20+0+0+10 = 60.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Qwen3.5-0.8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 80 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 60 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 37 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 46.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.
Qwen3.5-0.8B
A tiny vision-language model for prototypes, fine-tuning and narrow local steps such as routing, tagging or reading an image. It runs in about 1 GB at 4 or 8 bits in six runtimes under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The card has no safety results, and Qwen has answered none of its discussions.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:0.8b, orqwen3.5:0.8b-q8_0at 1.0 GB - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add--reasoning-parser qwen3in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0for text without thinking - Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.5-0.8B?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-1b qwen3-5-0-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-1b", "b": "qwen3-5-0-8b"}at/mcp, no key