Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B

LFM2.5-2.6B scores 51.5 (D) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

LFM2.5-2.6B D

Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold

Ahead on

  • Reach, 95 against 80
  • Agent interface, 75 against 60
  • Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 37

Watch for

Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue

Qwen3.5-0.8B D

Best for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU

Ahead on

  • Risk, 55 against 50

Watch for

No quantised build from Alibaba and no inference provider found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLFM2.5-2.6BQwen3.5-0.8BEdge
Capability35%351317Qwen3.5-0.8B +4
Reach25%259580LFM2.5-2.6B +15
Risk20%205055Qwen3.5-0.8B +5
Agent interface10%107560LFM2.5-2.6B +15
Documentation and upkeep10%105737LFM2.5-2.6B +20
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 51.5/100D 46.7/100

Facts side by side

FactLFM2.5-2.6BQwen3.5-0.8B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorLiquid AIAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceLFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue)Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-222026-03-02
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.5/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

LFM2.5-2.6B

A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.

Qwen3.5-0.8B

A tiny vision-language cousin for prototypes, fine-tuning and light local steps such as routing, tagging or reading an image, running in under 2 GB in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The main risk is neglect, with no hosted option, safety results or answers from Alibaba since March.

Before you call either

LFM2.5-2.6B

  1. Quickest start is ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, or llama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF
  2. With vLLM or SGLang pass --tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add --reasoning-parser qwen3 so the thinking comes back separately
  3. Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
  4. Put tools in the system prompt as List of tools: [...] JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead
  5. Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
  6. Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless preserve_thinking is true
  7. Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
  8. Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented

Qwen3.5-0.8B

  1. Smallest start is ollama run qwen3.5:0.8b, or qwen3.5:0.8b-q8_0 at 1.0 GB
  2. Full precision vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder
  3. Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with "chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add --reasoning-parser qwen3 in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out
  4. There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0 for text without thinking
  5. Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
  6. Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Qwen3.5-0.8B?

LFM2.5-2.6B scores 51.5 (D) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on risk.

Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Qwen3.5-0.8B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.