Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
gpt-oss-120b BB
Best for Agents on one 80 GB GPU or a 128 GB unified machine that want an Apache 2.0 reasoning model with wide runtime support
Ahead on
- Capability, 54 against 17
- Risk, 95 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 45 against 37
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
Needs about 78 GB, too big for 64 GB machines, and OpenAI ships only one precision
Best for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 75
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba and no inference provider found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.5-0.8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 54 | 17 | gpt-oss-120b +37 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 80 | Qwen3.5-0.8B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 95 | 55 | gpt-oss-120b +40 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 60 | gpt-oss-120b +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 45 | 37 | gpt-oss-120b +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70.2/100 | D 46.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-120b
A reasoning and agent cousin that runs in most runtimes under Apache 2.0 with published safety work. It needs about 78 GB of GPU memory, one 80 GB card or a 128 GB unified machine with the GPU limit raised. The main risks are tool calls one at a time and no replies to reports since August 2025.
Qwen3.5-0.8B
A tiny vision-language cousin for prototypes, fine-tuning and light local steps such as routing, tagging or reading an image, running in under 2 GB in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The main risk is neglect, with no hosted option, safety results or answers from Alibaba since March.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-120b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:120bon the reference machine, the build that fits - On the Strix Halo machine raise the GPU memory limit first with
amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is below the 78 GB it needs - With vLLM use
vllm serve openai/gpt-oss-120b --tool-call-parser openai --enable-auto-tool-choiceper vLLM's recipe, or parse raw output with openai-harmony - Always use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony, the card says it won't work correctly otherwise
- Set
Reasoning: lowin the system message for short tasks, medium is the default - Pass the reasoning back after a tool call until the final answer, and keep the analysis channel away from end users
- Expect one tool call per turn and loop, don't wait for parallel calls
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:0.8b, orqwen3.5:0.8b-q8_0at 1.0 GB - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add--reasoning-parser qwen3in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0for text without thinking - Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3.5-0.8B?
gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-120b
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-120b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-120b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-120b qwen3-5-0-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-120b", "b": "qwen3-5-0-8b"}at/mcp, no key