Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-120b vs North Mini Code 1.0
gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against North Mini Code 1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. North Mini Code 1.0 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
gpt-oss-120b BB
Best for Agents on one 80 GB GPU or a 128 GB unified machine that want an Apache 2.0 reasoning model with wide runtime support
Ahead on
- Risk, 95 against 60
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 45 against 36
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
Needs about 78 GB, too big for 64 GB machines, and OpenAI ships only one precision
Best for Developers who want a coding agent on their own GPU with a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
Watch for
No limitations, safety results, languages or data description on the card
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk gpt-oss-120b +35
gpt-oss-120b 95
File safety earns 25, safetensors only, with metal/model.bin a raw format and not pickle, and nothing from the repository runs on load. Provenance earns 15, files in OpenAI's linked organisation with a hash for every file. Safety evaluation earns 20, published results with SecureBio as an outside evaluator. Agent guidance earns 15 for the trained instruction hierarchy with prompt-injection results. Licence risk keeps all 15. The security programme earns 5 for OpenAI's Bugcrowd programme and disclosure policy, and the advisories half scores 0 because GitHub couldn't be checked, not because it was found missing.
North Mini Code 1.0 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in Cohere's verified CohereLabs organisation, which cohere.com links to per our other Cohere listings (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 5, Cohere's trust centre holds a responsible disclosure policy with a bug bounty, as recorded on our Cohere listings (5). 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 60.
Reach North Mini Code 1.0 +10
gpt-oss-120b 75
Memory earns 10, because the smallest 4-bit build, Ollama's 65 GB gpt-oss:120b, needs about 78 GB with the fifth added, which fits the reference machine but not 64 GB. Runtimes earn the full 25 from Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Ollama. Builds earn 10, since OpenAI ships one precision, MXFP4. Terms earn 15 for Apache 2.0 with a policy that asks only for lawful use. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 5, since 11 inference providers serve it on Hugging Face even though OpenAI's own API doesn't.
North Mini Code 1.0 85
Memory 25, the smallest build from Cohere is the w4a16 repository, 19.38 GB, and 19.38 GB × 1.2 = 23.3 GB, within 24 GB. Unsloth's GGUF isn't read for this line. Runtimes 20, Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 have the cohere2_moe model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the cohere2moe architecture. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Cohere at two precisions, FP8 and 4-bit weights (w4a16), each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the metadata and on the card, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its builds on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 25 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Documentation and upkeep gpt-oss-120b +9
gpt-oss-120b 45
The model card earns 20, with all seven items in OpenAI's arXiv card. Training data earns 10, a general description with a cut-off. Last change earns 5, since the last change to code that runs the model was the Metal reference on 1 November 2025, a year before this check, and the files date from August 2025. It drops to 0 after 1 November 2026 unless the files, template or reference code change. Responsiveness earns 0, with no OpenAI reply in the 40 latest discussions. Version policy earns 5 as a first release. File health earns 5, the files agree but template and tokenizer reports wait without a reply.
North Mini Code 1.0 36
Model card 11, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters and the context are on the card. Training data 0, the card gives the training method and nothing about the data. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 15 June 2026 (outdated chat templates removed), 148 days before this check, and the draft model's repository on 29 July, 104 days. Responsiveness 0, none of the 11 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (7 June to 6 November 2026) has a reply from a CohereLabs member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, A first release, with each build in its own repository. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, and the June commit that removed broken templates says so. 11 + 0 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 36.
Agent interface gpt-oss-120b +5
gpt-oss-120b 90
The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, since OpenAI documents declarations and returned calls in harmony and tells vLLM users to parse with openai-harmony. Trained tool calling earns 10, because each call stops generation, so calls come one at a time. Structured output earns 15 for the documented Response Formats section with a JSON Schema. Reasoning control earns 10, three effort levels per request with the reasoning on the analysis channel. Context earns 10 for 131,072 trained tokens.
North Mini Code 1.0 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (12,397 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (JSON schema through the chat template), how the call and its thinking go back into the history and how results are appended, and names the cohere_command4 tool-call parser for vLLM, which released vLLM has. Trained tool calling 20, the card says the model was specifically trained with tool-use capabilities for agentic coding, with reinforcement learning on verifiable tasks, and the template renders every call in a turn with thinking between them. Structured output 0, JSON schema is for describing tools. Reasoning control 10, the template has a reasoning_effort setting, and the card names the cohere_command4 reasoning parser, which returns thinking apart from the answer. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, with 64K of output, and 500,000 positions in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-120b | North Mini Code 1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | North Mini Code 1.0 +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 95 | 60 | gpt-oss-120b +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 85 | gpt-oss-120b +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 45 | 36 | gpt-oss-120b +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-120b | North Mini Code 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | Cohere |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-07-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-120b
A reasoning and agent cousin that runs in most runtimes under Apache 2.0 with published safety work. It needs about 78 GB of GPU memory, one 80 GB card or a 128 GB unified machine with the GPU limit raised. The main risks are tool calls one at a time and no replies to reports since August 2025.
North Mini Code 1.0
A coding agent model that fits one 24 GB GPU at 4 bits, trained for tool use, with a 256K context, Apache 2.0 and four released runtimes. It's a research release and reads like one: nothing on limitations, safety or data, the card's run instructions are out of date, and Cohere hasn't answered a question on the repository.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-120b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:120bon the reference machine, the build that fits - On the Strix Halo machine raise the GPU memory limit first with
amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is below the 78 GB it needs - With vLLM use
vllm serve openai/gpt-oss-120b --tool-call-parser openai --enable-auto-tool-choiceper vLLM's recipe, or parse raw output with openai-harmony - Always use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony, the card says it won't work correctly otherwise
- Set
Reasoning: lowin the system message for short tasks, medium is the default - Pass the reasoning back after a tool call until the final answer, and keep the analysis channel away from end users
- Expect one tool call per turn and loop, don't wait for parallel calls
North Mini Code 1.0
- Serve it with vLLM 0.33.0 or later and
--tool-call-parser cohere_command4 --reasoning-parser cohere_command4 --enable-auto-tool-choice, withcohere_melodyinstalled - Pass the model's thinking back with its tool calls on every turn. The card says results drop without it
- Describe tools in JSON schema and append tool results as a dictionary with the tool role
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- For llama.cpp the GGUF files are Unsloth's or bartowski's conversions, not Cohere's
- It's text only. Don't send images
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-120b or North Mini Code 1.0?
gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against North Mini Code 1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. North Mini Code 1.0 leads on reach.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-120b or North Mini Code 1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Agents-A1-4B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Arete-27B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Arete-27B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-120b
- BigBang-v1 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-120b
- Carbon-X vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Cola2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- Cola2 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-120b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs North Mini Code 1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs North Mini Code 1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Devstral Small 2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- Devstral Small 2 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs North Mini Code 1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-120b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-1.7B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large 4
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-120b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Granite 4.2 8B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Hy3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Inkling-Small vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Inkling vs North Mini Code 1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Kimi K3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Kronos vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LBS-27B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-1.7B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-VL-2B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Mistral Large 4 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs occamy-1.0
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-north-mini-code-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-120b.json·/api/v1/tools/north-mini-code-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-120b north-mini-code-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-120b", "b": "north-mini-code-1-0"}at/mcp, no key