Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
gpt-oss-120b BB
Best for Agents on one 80 GB GPU or a 128 GB unified machine that want an Apache 2.0 reasoning model with wide runtime support
Ahead on
- Capability, 54 against 31
- Risk, 95 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
Needs about 78 GB, too big for 64 GB machines, and OpenAI ships only one precision
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 45
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-120b | Ling-3.0-tiny | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 54 | 31 | gpt-oss-120b +23 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 90 | Ling-3.0-tiny +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 95 | 50 | gpt-oss-120b +45 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 60 | gpt-oss-120b +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 45 | 56 | Ling-3.0-tiny +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70.2/100 | C 55/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-120b | Ling-3.0-tiny |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-120b
A reasoning and agent cousin that runs in most runtimes under Apache 2.0 with published safety work. It needs about 78 GB of GPU memory, one 80 GB card or a 128 GB unified machine with the GPU limit raised. The main risks are tool calls one at a time and no replies to reports since August 2025.
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-120b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:120bon the reference machine, the build that fits - On the Strix Halo machine raise the GPU memory limit first with
amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is below the 78 GB it needs - With vLLM use
vllm serve openai/gpt-oss-120b --tool-call-parser openai --enable-auto-tool-choiceper vLLM's recipe, or parse raw output with openai-harmony - Always use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony, the card says it won't work correctly otherwise
- Set
Reasoning: lowin the system message for short tasks, medium is the default - Pass the reasoning back after a tool call until the final answer, and keep the analysis channel away from end users
- Expect one tool call per turn and loop, don't wait for parallel calls
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-120b or Ling-3.0-tiny?
gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-120b or Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-120b
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-120b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-ling-3-0-tiny.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-120b.json·/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-120b ling-3-0-tiny(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-120b", "b": "ling-3-0-tiny"}at/mcp, no key