Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
Apertus v1.5 8B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a fully open, multilingual 8B with image and audio input on one 24 GB GPU, and can run a publisher fork of vLLM.
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 84 against 56
Watch for
No released runtime supports it, only Swiss AI's forks of vLLM and Transformers
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 40
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apertus v1.5 8B | Ling-3.0-tiny | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 90 | Ling-3.0-tiny +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 50 | Apertus v1.5 8B +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Apertus v1.5 8B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 84 | 56 | Apertus v1.5 8B +28 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 55/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apertus v1.5 8B | Ling-3.0-tiny |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Swiss AI Initiative (EPFL and ETH Zurich) | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0, with the Apertus Acceptable Use Policy (v1.5, 14 July 2026) accepted at the download gate | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Apertus v1.5 8B
A fully open 8B cousin, training data included, for multilingual chat and tool calls with images and audio in. It needs about 22 GB in BF16 and Swiss AI's own vLLM or Transformers fork, since no released runtime supports it. The main risks are a gated download with a policy to pass on and tools that fail with thinking on.
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
Before you call either
Apertus v1.5 8B
- Accept the terms on the card and set HF_TOKEN before downloading
- Use Swiss AI's Docker image ghcr.io/swiss-ai/vllm_apertus_1.5_release, since stock vLLM and Transformers don't load Apertus1p5ForConditionalGeneration yet
- Serve with
--chat-template-content-format string --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser apertusfor tools, and leave thinking off when you need tools - For thinking, set
--reasoning-parser apertusand--default-chat-template-kwargs.enable_thinking true, and budget max tokens generously - Audio is resampled to 24 kHz and costs 40 tokens a second, and video must be passed as frames
- Don't cast the loaded model with .half(), the image and audio tokenizers must stay in F32
- If you redistribute the weights, the policy says you must pass it on and get the recipient's express assent
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Apertus v1.5 8B or Ling-3.0-tiny?
Apertus v1.5 8B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Apertus v1.5 8B or Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs Apertus v1.5 8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Apodex-1.1-mini
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs BigBang-v1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/apertus-v1-5-8b-vs-ling-3-0-tiny.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/apertus-v1-5-8b.json·/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json - From a terminal
anchor compare apertus-v1-5-8b ling-3-0-tiny(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "apertus-v1-5-8b", "b": "ling-3-0-tiny"}at/mcp, no key