Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 56
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.0-tiny | MiniCPM5-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 31 | 27 | Ling-3.0-tiny +4 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 75 | MiniCPM5-2B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 97 | MiniCPM5-2B +41 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55/100 | C 60.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.0-tiny | MiniCPM5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.0-tiny or MiniCPM5-2B?
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.0-tiny or MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-minicpm5-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-0-tiny minicpm5-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-0-tiny", "b": "minicpm5-2b"}at/mcp, no key