Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 40
- Risk, 55 against 35
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.
Ahead on
- Capability, 64 against 27
Watch for
No released vLLM or SGLang ran it on 24 October 2026; only llama.cpp b11861 from that day did
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 27 | 64 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +37 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 40 | MiniCPM5-2B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 35 | MiniCPM5-2B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 41 | MiniCPM5-2B +56 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | D 50.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights, and vLLM and SGLang support was pre-release on 24 October 2026. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
- On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM's nightly image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
- Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
- --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
- Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
- For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
- Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on capability.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b minimax-m3-1-flash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "minimax-m3-1-flash"}at/mcp, no key