Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 80
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 43
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want Qwen3.8-27B's skills with shorter thinking, for teams under US$1M revenue or research.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Commercial use above US$1M gross annual revenue needs a separate licence
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 80 | MiniCPM5-2B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | MiniCPM5-2B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 43 | MiniCPM5-2B +54 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue with a separate Swift Enterprise License above it. Built on Qwen3.8-27B, whose Apache 2.0 still governs the base |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and agent work with images in, that fits a 24 GB machine with UkisAI's own 4-bit builds. Commercial use is free only below US$1M revenue. The main risks are that nobody at UkisAI answers its discussions, and that the shorter thinking rests on UkisAI's own benchmarks.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 18.4 GB with the vision projector - On our reference machine BF16 fits,
vllm serve ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27b --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - The template is Qwen3.8-27B's, so
chat_template_kwargswithreasoning_effortlow, medium or xhigh (default) andenable_thinkingfalse work as on the base - UkisAI benchmarked it at temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 0, which is a reasonable starting point
- The MLX 4-bit build needs UkisAI's patched MLX-LM and has no image or video chat
- Check the licence before commercial use, it stops at US$1M gross annual revenue including affiliates
- MTP self-speculative decoding is available with the base's head, flags on the card
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B?
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key