Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM5-2B's 60.2 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. MiniCPM5-2B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 36
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Capability, 70 against 27
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 27 | 70 | Qwen3.8-27B +43 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 36 | MiniCPM5-2B +61 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | B 68.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-08-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and five providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Qwen3.8-27B?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM5-2B's 60.2 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. MiniCPM5-2B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key