Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 57.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls and can live with its use policy
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
230 GB in FP8, and about 155 GB for the smallest 4-bit library build, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 36 against 22
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 73 | 70 | MiniMax-M2.5 +3 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 90 | Qwen3.8-27B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 55 | Qwen3.8-27B +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniMax-M2.5 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 22 | 36 | Qwen3.8-27B +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.5/100 | B 68.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax Model License (model) and modified MIT (code) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-02-12 | 2026-08-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is a 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent work, with parallel tool calls, a 196K context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4-GPU server for FP8 or about 155 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risk is a licence replaced after release with a Prohibited Uses Policy while the card still says modified MIT.
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and five providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.5
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache
- On a single large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.5 lists a Q4_K_M GGUF of 138 GB and an MLX 4-bit of 129 GB (Mac only), and LM Studio states 121 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends
- Budget output tokens for thinking on every turn, since the template always opens a think block
- Read LICENSE-MODEL, not the card's licence link, before shipping, and keep the required Notice text in every copy
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita or Featherless AI; MiniMax's own API retires M2.5 on 18 November 2026
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 57.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-5 qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-5", "b": "qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key