Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 57.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls and can live with its use policy
Ahead on
- Capability, 73 against 46
Watch for
230 GB in FP8, and about 155 GB for the smallest 4-bit library build, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Agents with a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a quick tool-calling and reasoning cousin with very long context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 65
- Risk, 60 against 30
- Agent interface, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 22
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
The documented vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM commands pass trust-remote-code and load a parser file from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 73 | 46 | MiniMax-M2.5 +27 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 60 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 22 | 75 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +53 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.5/100 | B 67.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax Model License (model) and modified MIT (code) | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License (custom, Apache-style, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-02-12 | 2026-08-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is a 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent work, with parallel tool calls, a 196K context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4-GPU server for FP8 or about 155 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risk is a licence replaced after release with a Prohibited Uses Policy while the card still says modified MIT.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
A fast hybrid Mamba-Transformer cousin with 3.5B active parameters for reasoning and tool calling over very long inputs, in every major local runtime. A 4-bit build needs about 22 to 23 GB. The main risks are that NVIDIA's documented vLLM path runs repository code, no safety results are published and NVIDIA hasn't answered reports since March.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.5
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache
- On a single large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.5 lists a Q4_K_M GGUF of 138 GB and an MLX 4-bit of 129 GB (Mac only), and LM Studio states 121 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends
- Budget output tokens for thinking on every turn, since the template always opens a think block
- Read LICENSE-MODEL, not the card's licence link, before shipping, and keep the required Notice text in every copy
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita or Featherless AI; MiniMax's own API retires M2.5 on 18 November 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b(18 GB MLX on a Mac, 24 GB q4_K_M elsewhere) - On the reference machine use BF16 with vLLM, after
wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16/resolve/main/nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py, thenvllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 --max-model-len 262144 --trust-remote-code --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - NVFP4 needs an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, and FP8 isn't documented on gfx1151
- Without the qwen3_coder tool parser and the nano_v3 reasoning parser, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Card sampling is temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 for tool calling, temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 for reasoning
- Thinking is on by default, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Set VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 and raise --max-model-len only when you need more than 262,144 tokens
- In SGLang the main branch names the reasoning parser nemotron_3, not the card's nano_v3
- Filter untrusted tool results before they reach the model, as NVIDIA warns prompt injection can lead to code execution
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since none is documented for the model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 57.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on capability.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-5 nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-5", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key