Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's 67.1 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Muse Glimmer 30B BB

Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough

Ahead on

  • Risk, 80 against 60

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.3 out of 5

Watch for

One tool call per turn and no parallel calls

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B B

Best for Agents with a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a quick tool-calling and reasoning cousin with very long context.

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 90 against 75
  • Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 65

Watch for

The documented vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM commands pass trust-remote-code and load a parser file from the repository

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BEdge
Capability35%355046Muse Glimmer 30B +4
Reach25%259090even
Risk20%208060Muse Glimmer 30B +20
Agent interface10%107590Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +15
Documentation and upkeep10%106575Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +10
Negative events≤1500
TotalBB 70/100B 67.1/100

Facts side by side

FactMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorMetaNVIDIA
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License (custom, Apache-style, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-202026-08-24
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3.8/5 (4)3.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Muse Glimmer 30B

A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

A fast hybrid Mamba-Transformer cousin with 3.5B active parameters for reasoning and tool calling over very long inputs, in every major local runtime. A 4-bit build needs about 22 to 23 GB. The main risks are that NVIDIA's documented vLLM path runs repository code, no safety results are published and NVIDIA hasn't answered reports since March.

Before you call either

Muse Glimmer 30B

  1. Start it with llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}' on llama.cpp b10353 or later, or ollama run muse-glimmer on Ollama 0.32.7 or later
  2. In vLLM pass --tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLang muse for both, in ExecuTorch --tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text
  3. Set reasoning per request with chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength (low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't read reasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400
  4. Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects tool_choice="required"
  5. Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on <|eom|>
  6. Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
  7. For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

  1. Start it with ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b (18 GB MLX on a Mac, 24 GB q4_K_M elsewhere)
  2. On the reference machine use BF16 with vLLM, after wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16/resolve/main/nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py, then vllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 --max-model-len 262144 --trust-remote-code --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3
  3. NVFP4 needs an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, and FP8 isn't documented on gfx1151
  4. Without the qwen3_coder tool parser and the nano_v3 reasoning parser, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
  5. Card sampling is temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 for tool calling, temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 for reasoning
  6. Thinking is on by default, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
  7. Set VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 and raise --max-model-len only when you need more than 262,144 tokens
  8. In SGLang the main branch names the reasoning parser nemotron_3, not the card's nano_v3
  9. Filter untrusted tool results before they reach the model, as NVIDIA warns prompt injection can lead to code execution
  10. Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since none is documented for the model

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's 67.1 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.

Other comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.