Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Kolibri-1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Kolibri-1 leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for German and English agent work with tools on a machine with about 96 GB of accelerator memory and vLLM, where a permissive licence matters.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 65
Watch for
The smallest publisher build is FP8 at 78.8 GB, so it needs about 95 GB and won't fit a 64 GB machine
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 60
- Risk, 80 against 65
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.3 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kolibri-1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 90 | Muse Glimmer 30B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 80 | Muse Glimmer 30B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 75 | Kolibri-1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 70 | 65 | Kolibri-1 +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | BB 70/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kolibri-1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Aleph Alpha | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kolibri-1
Kolibri-1 is a German and English reasoning model with a documented tool-call format, switchable thinking and a 262,144-token context, under Apache 2.0. Aleph Alpha's FP8 build needs about 95 GB and runs on vLLM through its plugin, Transformers 5.20 or recent llama.cpp. The main risk is no published safety results or security contact, and few repository answers.
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
Kolibri-1
- Start it with pip install 'aleph-alpha-inference>=1' then vllm serve Aleph-Alpha/Kolibri-1 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --reasoning-parser kolibri1 --tool-call-parser kolibri1 --enable-auto-tool-choice
- Without the kolibri1 tool-call parser and enable-auto-tool-choice, tool calls come back as text in tool_call tags
- The plugin supports one vLLM minor version, 0.29, so don't upgrade vLLM while it's installed
- Thinking is on by default at high effort. Pass reasoning_effort none or enable_thinking false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.97 and top_k 128
- Past 262,144 tokens, add --max-model-len 1048576 and the max_position_embeddings override in --hf-overrides, though Aleph Alpha recommends staying at or below 262,144
- With Transformers 5.20 or later, tokenizer.parse_response returns the answer in content and the reasoning in thinking
- On the reference machine the FP8 build fits by size, but no document confirms vLLM runs FP8 on gfx1151, and Aleph Alpha ships no GGUF for llama.cpp
- Validate tool results in your own code, as the card asks
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kolibri-1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Kolibri-1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Kolibri-1 leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Kolibri-1 or Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kolibri-1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kolibri-1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kolibri-1
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kolibri-1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kolibri-1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Kolibri-1
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kolibri-1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kolibri-1-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kolibri-1.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kolibri-1 muse-glimmer-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kolibri-1", "b": "muse-glimmer-30b"}at/mcp, no key