Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against MiniCPM5-2B's 60.2 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. MiniCPM5-2B leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 65
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Capability, 50 against 27
- Risk, 80 against 55
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 27 | 50 | Muse Glimmer 30B +23 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 80 | Muse Glimmer 30B +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 65 | MiniCPM5-2B +32 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | BB 70/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against MiniCPM5-2B's 60.2 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. MiniCPM5-2B leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b muse-glimmer-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "muse-glimmer-30b"}at/mcp, no key