Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 52.3 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 60
- Risk, 55 against 45
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 40
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next D
Best for Teams under US$1M revenue, or researchers, with an 8-GPU node who want Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with shorter thinking for coding and agent work.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Two licences to satisfy, UkisAI's US$1M revenue limit and Qwen's separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 60 | MiniCPM5-2B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 45 | MiniCPM5-2B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | MiniCPM5-2B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 40 | MiniCPM5-2B +57 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue, plus the Qwen Community License 1.0 on the base, which needs a separate licence from Qwen for a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business and the model name shown above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A large mixture-of-experts cousin, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and long agent sessions on a multi-GPU server. Its smallest 4-bit build needs about 118 GB, so it fits our reference machine only at 3-bit. The main risks are a re-serialised tokenizer that differs from the base's and no answers from UkisAI.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a multi-GPU node use
vllm serve ukisai/Swift1.5-Qwen3.8-Flash-Next --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, the parser the base's recipes and the card's SGLang command use - The card's vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code and the old repository name, neither is needed
- On our reference machine only UkisAI's GSQ-RCO IQ3_S GGUF (84.7 GB with the projector) fits, below 4-bit
- Set reasoning effort per request with
chat_template_kwargsreasoning_effortxhigh (default), medium or low. UkisAI's own runs lose about 2.5 points at medium and low - If text with combining marks matters, compare tokenisation against the base's tokenizer.json before trusting outputs
- Check both licences before commercial use, UkisAI's stops at US$1M gross annual revenue and Qwen's needs a separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 52.3 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key