Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Ornith-1.5-397B scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 52.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 65 against 60
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next D
Best for Teams under US$1M revenue, or researchers, with an 8-GPU node who want Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with shorter thinking for coding and agent work.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Two licences to satisfy, UkisAI's US$1M revenue limit and Qwen's separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-397B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 60 | Ornith-1.5-397B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | Ornith-1.5-397B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Ornith-1.5-397B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 40 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-397B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue, plus the Qwen Community License 1.0 on the base, which needs a separate licence from Qwen for a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business and the model name shown above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-23 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A large mixture-of-experts cousin, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and long agent sessions on a multi-GPU server. Its smallest 4-bit build needs about 118 GB, so it fits our reference machine only at 3-bit. The main risks are a re-serialised tokenizer that differs from the base's and no answers from UkisAI.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a multi-GPU node use
vllm serve ukisai/Swift1.5-Qwen3.8-Flash-Next --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, the parser the base's recipes and the card's SGLang command use - The card's vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code and the old repository name, neither is needed
- On our reference machine only UkisAI's GSQ-RCO IQ3_S GGUF (84.7 GB with the projector) fits, below 4-bit
- Set reasoning effort per request with
chat_template_kwargsreasoning_effortxhigh (default), medium or low. UkisAI's own runs lose about 2.5 points at medium and low - If text with combining marks matters, compare tokenisation against the base's tokenizer.json before trusting outputs
- Check both licences before commercial use, UkisAI's stops at US$1M gross annual revenue and Qwen's needs a separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-397B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Ornith-1.5-397B scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 52.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-397B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-397b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-397b swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-397b", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key