Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a local model to see, hear and speak on a laptop or a single small GPU, with a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 66 against 36
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
Speech output and full duplex need trust_remote_code with Transformers 4.51.0 or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Risk, 50 against 40
- Agent interface, 85 against 35
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-o 4.5 | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 65 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 50 | Ornith-1.5-397B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 35 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-397B +50 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 66 | 36 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +30 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-o 4.5 | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0; built from Qwen3-8B, SigLIP2, Whisper-medium and CosyVoice2, all Apache 2.0 on their Hub cards | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM-o 4.5
A small omni cousin that sees, listens and talks back, with full-duplex speech and voice cloning, in about 7 GB at 4-bit through llama.cpp or Ollama for text and images. Speech output needs OpenBMB's remote code or llama.cpp-omni, and 28 GB of GPU for the full demo. The main risks are repository code and pickle files and no safety results.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Quickest start for text and images is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm-o4.5, about 6 GB - With vLLM 0.16.0 or later pass
--trust-remote-code, and sendstop_token_ids[151643, 151645] as OpenBMB's guide does - vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama return text only; for speech out use the card's Transformers 4.51.0 code or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
- In llama.cpp pass both the language GGUF and MiniCPM-o-4_5-vision-F16.gguf with
--mmproj, and use--jinja --reasoning-budget 0to turn thinking off - Keep prompts within 40,960 tokens
- Don't rely on tool calls or JSON output, neither is documented; validate any you get
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-o 4.5 or Ornith-1.5-397B?
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-o 4.5 or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-o-4-5-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-o-4-5.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-o-4-5 ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-o-4-5", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key