Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 581 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 40
- Agent interface, 75 against 35
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Agents that need a local model to see, hear and speak on a laptop or a single small GPU, with a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 66 against 46
Watch for
Speech output and full duplex need trust_remote_code with Transformers 4.51.0 or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-o 4.5 +55
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 90
Memory 30, OpenBMB's 4-bit GGUF with its vision file is 5.9 GB, about 7 GB with a fifth added. Runtimes 15 of 25, released vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama run it, while Transformers 5.22.1 still needs OpenBMB's remote code and SGLang 0.5.23 supports only the older 2.6. Builds 15, GGUF at several precisions plus AWQ and GPTQ. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0. Download 10, nothing gated. Hosted 5, OpenBMB's own API serves it.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +40
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 35
Chat template 20, a Jinja template in the tokenizer config. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, only the inherited Qwen3 template says how tools work. Trained tool calling 0, OpenBMB never mentions tool use. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, thinking turns on and off per request but nobody says where the reasoning comes back. Context 5, 40,960 tokens. Read as an omni model, it takes images, video and audio and returns text and streaming speech, which the card documents with code.
Risk LongCat-2.5 +20
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 40
File safety 5 of 25, two pickle files sit in the speech stage and the documented load runs repository code. Provenance 15, the files are in the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub links, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, general cautions only, nothing about voice cloning misuse, prompt injection or refusals. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt, policy or advisories.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-o 4.5 +20
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 66
Model card 11 of 20, limitations, context length and a knowledge cut-off are missing. Training data 5, described by kind without sources, sizes or a cut-off. Last change 20, the card changed on 24 October 2026. Responsiveness 10, OpenBMB answered half of the 12 questions. Version policy 10, earlier models stay in their own repositories and releases are dated. File health 10, the files agree and the two bug reports have replies.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 90 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +55 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 40 | LongCat-2.5 +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 35 | LongCat-2.5 +40 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 66 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0; built from Qwen3-8B, SigLIP2, Whisper-medium and CosyVoice2, all Apache 2.0 on their Hub cards |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
MiniCPM-o 4.5
A small omni cousin that sees, listens and talks back, with full-duplex speech and voice cloning, in about 7 GB at 4-bit through llama.cpp or Ollama for text and images. Speech output needs OpenBMB's remote code or llama.cpp-omni, and 28 GB of GPU for the full demo. The main risks are repository code and pickle files and no safety results.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Quickest start for text and images is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm-o4.5, about 6 GB - With vLLM 0.16.0 or later pass
--trust-remote-code, and sendstop_token_ids[151643, 151645] as OpenBMB's guide does - vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama return text only; for speech out use the card's Transformers 4.51.0 code or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
- In llama.cpp pass both the language GGUF and MiniCPM-o-4_5-vision-F16.gguf with
--mmproj, and use--jinja --reasoning-budget 0to turn thinking off - Keep prompts within 40,960 tokens
- Don't rely on tool calls or JSON output, neither is documented; validate any you get
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or MiniCPM-o 4.5?
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-minicpm-o-4-5.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-o-4-5.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 minicpm-o-4-5(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "minicpm-o-4-5"}at/mcp, no key