Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 46
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach occamy-1.0 +55
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
occamy-1.0 90
Memory 25 of 30, Accio's MLX mxfp4 build is 18.4 GB, 22.1 GB with a fifth added, and its IQ4_XS GGUF needs 22.5 GB, both within 24 GB. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, it keeps the base's qwen3_5_moe architecture, which llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers run in released versions, and Ollama v0.40.14 builds a llama.cpp (b11963) that has it. Builds 15, FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX from Accio. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 like its base. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no API or inference provider serves it. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Documentation and upkeep occamy-1.0 +28
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
occamy-1.0 74
Model card 14 of 20, languages and a knowledge cut-off are missing. Training data 15, the mix by type with token counts, the method and a published subset, without a cut-off. Last change 20, Accio's GGUF build card changed on 19 October 2026 and the main card on 2 October. Responsiveness 10, Accio answered 4 of 9 questions. Version policy 5, a first release with no files replaced. File health 10, the files agree with the card. 14 + 15 + 20 + 10 + 5 + 10 = 74.
Risk LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
occamy-1.0 55
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts. Provenance 15, the files are in the organisation Accio's GitHub links, with MD5 sums and SHA-256 for every file. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 0. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0 that hasn't changed. Security programme 0, bug reports go to public GitHub issues and there's no security contact.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
occamy-1.0 70
Chat template 20, the base's Jinja template in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the card names the parser but the format lives only in the template. Trained tool calling 20, trained on tool use with several calls a turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request and the card says to keep the returned reasoning content. Context 10, 262,144 tokens.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | occamy-1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 90 | occamy-1.0 +55 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 74 | occamy-1.0 +28 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | occamy-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LongCat-2.5
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
- Ollama has no Occamy library entry, so load Accio's GGUF in Ollama 0.40.14 or later, which builds a llama.cpp with the qwen35moe architecture
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or occamy-1.0?
occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- Mistral Large 4 vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs occamy-1.0
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- occamy-1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-occamy-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 occamy-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "occamy-1-0"}at/mcp, no key