Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Mistral Large 4 vs occamy-1.0
occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Mistral Large 4's 54.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Mistral Large 4 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3588 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with an 8-GPU Blackwell or H200 node who want a frontier-sized open model for coding agents and defensive security, with a hosted twin on Mistral's API.
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 55
- Agent interface, 95 against 70
Watch for
The smallest 4-bit build needs about 732 GB, so nothing fits a single workstation or a 128 GB machine
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 64
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Mistral Large 4 | occamy-1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 85 | occamy-1.0 +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 55 | Mistral Large 4 +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 95 | 70 | Mistral Large 4 +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 64 | 74 | occamy-1.0 +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Mistral Large 4 | occamy-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Mistral AI | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License (modified MIT) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Mistral Large 4
A frontier-sized open cousin for coding agents and defensive security, with strict JSON Schema output, parallel tool calls and three reasoning efforts. It needs a multi-GPU server, about 732 GB for the smallest 4-bit build, and vLLM and SGLang run it only from special images. The main risk is a licence that bars Model-as-a-Service businesses without a separate deal.
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Before you call either
Mistral Large 4
- Serve the NVFP4 build on Blackwell with
vllm/vllm-openai:mistral-large-4 --model mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --kv-cache-dtype fp8_ds_mla --tool-call-parser mistral --reasoning-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choice; released vLLM doesn't load it - On H200 use the FP8 build with tensor parallelism of 16 or 8 by 2 pipelines, per vLLM's recipe
- Pass
reasoning_effortlow, medium or high (default high); any other value makes the template raise an error, and there is no off switch - Read the reasoning from
message.reasoning;max_completion_tokenscounts reasoning tokens too - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 at every effort, per the card
- Ask for JSON with
response_formattype json_schema and strict true; the template passes the schema to the model - The template rejects a tool message straight after a user message and a conversation that doesn't start with a user or system message
- Add
--speculative-config '{"method": "dspark", "num_speculative_tokens": 3}'to use the embedded draft head - If you'll offer it to others as a hosted model, read the licence first; Model-as-a-Service use needs Mistral's commercial licence
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Mistral Large 4 or occamy-1.0?
occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Mistral Large 4's 54.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Mistral Large 4 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Mistral Large 4 or occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs Mistral Large 4
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Mistral Large 4
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Mistral Large 4
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs Mistral Large 4
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- Carbon-X vs Mistral Large 4
- Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Mistral Large 4
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large 4
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Mistral Large 4
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Mistral Large 4
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Mistral Large 4
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Mistral Large 4
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kronos vs Mistral Large 4
- Kronos vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs Mistral Large 4
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Mistral Large 4 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Mistral Large 4 vs Recursive Flint
- Mistral Large 4 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Mistral Large 4 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mistral-large-4-vs-occamy-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mistral-large-4.json·/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mistral-large-4 occamy-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mistral-large-4", "b": "occamy-1-0"}at/mcp, no key