Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 60
- Risk, 55 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 27
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.7 | occamy-1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 85 | occamy-1.0 +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 55 | occamy-1.0 +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniMax-M2.7 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 27 | 74 | occamy-1.0 +47 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.1/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.7 | occamy-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-20 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.7 or occamy-1.0?
occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.7 or occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-occamy-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json·/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-7 occamy-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-7", "b": "occamy-1-0"}at/mcp, no key