Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
occamy-1.0 and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 67
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | occamy-1.0 | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 75 | occamy-1.0 +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Recursive Flint +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 90 | Recursive Flint +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 74 | 67 | occamy-1.0 +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | occamy-1.0 | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Accio (Accio-Lab) | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, occamy-1.0 or Recursive Flint?
occamy-1.0 and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with occamy-1.0 or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare occamy-1-0 recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "occamy-1-0", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key