Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Recursive Flint
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB C
Best for Agents and apps that need a fast local conversational model with tool calls on an 8 to 12 GB GPU, a Mac or a Jetson, such as voice assistants and game characters.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Risk, 80 against 60
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 4.0 against 3.5 out of 5
Watch for
64K tokens of context against the base's 128K, and Ollama's and LM Studio's pages show 128K anyway
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 75 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 80 | 60 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 90 | Recursive Flint +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 65 | 67 | Recursive Flint +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
A small cousin for voice and device assistants, game characters and robot interfaces, trained for multi-turn tool calls, instruction hierarchy and short spoken replies, with thinking switchable per request. NVIDIA's Q4_K_M GGUF needs about 8 GB, and Ollama and LM Studio carry it. Context is 64K, half the Gemma 4 base, and NVIDIA publishes no safety results.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3.5-bolt:e4b, about 8 GB of files, and setnum_ctxto 65536 or less, since NVIDIA supports 64K - With NVIDIA's GGUF use
llama-server -m Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-Q4_K_M.gguf -c 65536 -ngl 999 --jinja, and add--reasoning on --reasoning-budget <tokens>to cap thinking - With vLLM 0.31.0 or later pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4and the repository's chat_template.jinja - Pass
enable_thinkingexplicitly inchat_template_kwargs, since the template defaults to off whatever the card says, and setskip_special_tokensfalse as the card's examples do - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95in both modes, as the card says - Set
conversational_modetrue for spoken replies, which appends a brevity instruction to the system prompt - Answer a slow tool at once with a pending
toolmessage, then send the result later as a user message starting TOOL RESULT, as the card's asynchronous pattern says - Keep persistent rules in the system prompt and send state updates as separate user or system messages in order, per the card's prompting guidelines
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB or Recursive Flint?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Kronos vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kronos vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs occamy-1.0
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-2B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SmolLM3-3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key