Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
Recursive Flint and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 90 against 80
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 54
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Risk, 65 against 60
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Recursive Flint | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 80 | Recursive Flint +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 67 | 54 | Recursive Flint +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Recursive Flint | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Recursive | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-21 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.
Before you call either
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Recursive Flint or SmolLM3-3B?
Recursive Flint and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with Recursive Flint or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/recursive-flint-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare recursive-flint smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "recursive-flint", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key