Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Granite 4.2 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
Granite 4.2 8B and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 16 GB machine
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 85
- Agent interface, 85 against 80
- Documentation and upkeep, 92 against 74
Watch for
No safety results published for it
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Granite 4.2 8B +18
Granite 4.2 8B 92
Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (8B), context length (128K native) and 12 tested languages are on the card. Training data 20, IBM's disclosure file for the 8B lists the datasets used in pre-training and post-training as machine-readable metadata, and the card describes the three training stages. Last change 20, the last commit, on 20 October 2026, replaced model.safetensors.index.json (titled "granite-4.2 index file fix"), 21 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 5 discussions that aren't pull requests (13 September to 5 November 2026), 4 have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, Granite 4.1 8B stays in its own repository and 4.2 came out in new ones. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, the 131,072-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 92.
SmolLM3-3B 74
Model card 14, it covers limitations, architecture, parameters, context and languages but has no intended-use section and leaves the June 2025 cut-off to the chat template. Training data 20, the datasets, mixture weights and post-training set are published with sources and sizes. Last change 20, Hugging Face's ONNX build changed its tokenizer config on 28 October 2026, though the main repository hasn't changed since 10 September 2025. Responsiveness 10, staff answered 14 of 36 discussions, none since November 2025. Version policy 5, a first release never replaced, with no dated notes. File health 5, template and tokenizer reports wait with no reply.
Reach Granite 4.2 8B +10
Granite 4.2 8B 95
Memory 30, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-8b-q4-mlx is 4.95 GB, and 4.95 GB × 1.2 = 5.9 GB, within 8 GB. Its Q4_0 GGUF is 5.06 GB and Ollama's library build granite4.2:8b (5.3 GB) fits 8 GB too. Runtimes 25, Released versions run the granite architecture in llama.cpp (granite, b12242), vLLM (GraniteForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang (granite.py at v0.5.23), Transformers (v5.22.2) and Ollama (its own granite4.2 library entry, 8b tag). Builds 15, IBM publishes FP8, MXFP4 and NVFP4 safetensors builds, a GGUF repository with Q4_0 to Q8_0 and BF16 files, and 4-bit, 8-bit and BF16 MLX builds, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI-approved licence, with no use policy or other terms added on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX repositories, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps one inference provider (DeepInfra, live), short of the two the line needs. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
SmolLM3-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest 4-bit build Hugging Face publishes is its own ONNX q4f16 at 2.1 GB, about 2.5 GB with the fifth added, and the full BF16 files that the counted runtimes load come to about 7.4 GB, both under 16 GB. Runtimes 20, released Transformers carries the model code, llama.cpp knows the architecture, and vLLM and SGLang run it through their Transformers backends in released versions; Ollama has no library entry and LM Studio's catalogue has none, so those two earn nothing. Builds 10, Hugging Face's ONNX repository has 4-bit builds, one of the checklist's kinds, and int8 builds, which are neither FP8 nor GGUF. They run in ONNX Runtime and Transformers.js rather than the runtimes above. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0, scored by its terms since the repository holds no LICENSE file. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is listed for it on the Hub and none of the provider lists checked carries it.
Risk SmolLM3-3B +10
Granite 4.2 8B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the ibm-granite organisation, which IBM's Granite docs and the GitHub README link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, and the card's licence link resolves. Security programme 5, www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt names IBM PSIRT, read for the 3B listing on 4 November 2026 (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
SmolLM3-3B 65
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs on load or to build prompts. Provenance 15, the HuggingFaceTB organisation linked from Hugging Face's launch post, with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, only the general cautions in the card's Limitations section. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added and a working licence link. Security programme 5, huggingface.co has a valid security.txt and Transformers has a security policy; whether advisories are handled in public couldn't be checked from our session, so that half is scored as absent.
Agent interface Granite 4.2 8B +5
Granite 4.2 8B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort. Tool-calling format 25, the card has tool-calling sections for vLLM and SGLang, declares tools with OpenAI's function schema and names the parser to use, qwen3_coder, which both runtimes ship in the released versions read. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one turn, and the card names tool calling and agentic workflows as what it's best for. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output or how to ask for it. Reasoning control 10, the card documents thinking on by default, non-thinking and low-effort modes per request through the template (enable_thinking and low_effort), with the reasoning returned apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 tokens natively per the card and config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
SmolLM3-3B 80
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card says how tools are declared, how calls come back and which vLLM parser to use. Trained tool calling 20, the template invites one or more calls per turn, each in its own block. Structured output 0, nothing documents asking the weights for JSON. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request through the kwarg or a system-prompt flag, and the reasoning comes back in think tags. Context 5, trained at 65,536 tokens, with 131,072 only through YaRN.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Granite 4.2 8B | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 85 | Granite 4.2 8B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 80 | Granite 4.2 8B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 92 | 74 | Granite 4.2 8B +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Granite 4.2 8B | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | IBM | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Granite 4.2 8B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Granite 4.2 8B
IBM's mid-size reasoning cousin, with the same strengths as the 3B. It runs in every runtime we count from IBM's own builds on a 16 GB machine, is signed, plain Apache 2.0, and comes with a disclosure of its training data. No safety results are published and structured output isn't documented.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no staff reply in its discussions since November 2025.
Before you call either
Granite 4.2 8B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:8b, orllama-server -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later leave out
--reasoning-parser-plugin, since the parser is built in, and use--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinkingfalse to turn it off orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning - The context is 131,072 tokens. The card's 512K extension isn't documented
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- IBM recommends Granite Guardian beside it to flag risky inputs and outputs
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Granite 4.2 8B or SmolLM3-3B?
Granite 4.2 8B and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with Granite 4.2 8B or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Arete-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 8B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-8b.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare granite-4-2-8b smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "granite-4-2-8b", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key