Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against SmolLM3-3B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. SmolLM3-3B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B B

Best for Agents with a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a quick tool-calling and reasoning cousin with very long context.

Ahead on

  • Reach, 90 against 85
  • Agent interface, 90 against 80
  • Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 54

Watch for

The documented vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM commands pass trust-remote-code and load a parser file from the repository

SmolLM3-3B C

Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device

Ahead on

  • Risk, 65 against 60

Watch for

65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSmolLM3-3BEdge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%259085Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +5
Risk20%206065SmolLM3-3B +5
Agent interface10%109080Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +10
Documentation and upkeep10%107554Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +21
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 67.1/100C 61/100

Facts side by side

FactNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSmolLM3-3B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorNVIDIAHugging Face
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceNVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License (custom, Apache-style, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence)Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-08-242025-09-10
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3.3/5 (4)3.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

A fast hybrid Mamba-Transformer cousin with 3.5B active parameters for reasoning and tool calling over very long inputs, in every major local runtime. A 4-bit build needs about 22 to 23 GB. The main risks are that NVIDIA's documented vLLM path runs repository code, no safety results are published and NVIDIA hasn't answered reports since March.

SmolLM3-3B

A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.

Before you call either

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

  1. Start it with ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b (18 GB MLX on a Mac, 24 GB q4_K_M elsewhere)
  2. On the reference machine use BF16 with vLLM, after wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16/resolve/main/nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py, then vllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 --max-model-len 262144 --trust-remote-code --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3
  3. NVFP4 needs an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, and FP8 isn't documented on gfx1151
  4. Without the qwen3_coder tool parser and the nano_v3 reasoning parser, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
  5. Card sampling is temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 for tool calling, temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 for reasoning
  6. Thinking is on by default, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
  7. Set VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 and raise --max-model-len only when you need more than 262,144 tokens
  8. In SGLang the main branch names the reasoning parser nemotron_3, not the card's nano_v3
  9. Filter untrusted tool results before they reach the model, as NVIDIA warns prompt injection can lead to code execution
  10. Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since none is documented for the model

SmolLM3-3B

  1. Start it with vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text
  2. Pass chat_template_kwargs with enable_thinking false for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a /think or /no_think flag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg
  3. Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a tool_calls field when it renders history
  4. Add the YaRN rope_scaling block (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens
  5. Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
  6. Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
  7. Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or SmolLM3-3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against SmolLM3-3B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. SmolLM3-3B leads on risk.

Other comparisons with Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or SmolLM3-3B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.