Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 60
- Risk, 65 against 30
- Agent interface, 80 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 27
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.7 | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 85 | SmolLM3-3B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 80 | SmolLM3-3B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 27 | 54 | SmolLM3-3B +27 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.1/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.7 | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-20 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.7 or SmolLM3-3B?
SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.7 or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-7 smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-7", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key