Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 60
- Risk, 55 against 30
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 27
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.3 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 60 | Laguna S 2.1 +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 30 | Laguna S 2.1 +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Laguna S 2.1 +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 27 | Laguna S 2.1 +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 56.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-04-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or MiniMax-M2.7?
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-minimax-m2-7.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 minimax-m2-7(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "minimax-m2-7"}at/mcp, no key