Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
Inkling scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna S 2.1 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Inkling B
Best for Agents calling a hosted open multimodal model with audio input, or teams with a multi-GPU datacentre node who want to run it themselves.
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 710 GB, beyond any single workstation
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 50
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling | Laguna S 2.1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 75 | Laguna S 2.1 +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 55 | Inkling +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 82 | 41 | Inkling +41 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling | Laguna S 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Poolside |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-08-19 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Inkling
Thinking Machines' large multimodal generalist, stronger than Inkling-Small on factual recall by its own numbers. It needs about 710 GB of datacentre GPU memory even in NVFP4, so most agents will use a host such as Together AI or Tinker. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Before you call either
Inkling
- Unless you have a multi-GPU Blackwell or H200 node, call it through Together AI, Fireworks, DeepInfra or Tinker rather than starting it
- On 8 B200 GPUs, SGLang's recipe is
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-NVFP4 --tp 8 --quantization modelopt_fp4 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling - Use the inkling tool parser, not Hermes, and the inkling reasoning parser
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs list xhigh - Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Audio should be 16 kHz WAV, ideally under 20 minutes, and images 40 to 4096 px a side, per the card
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling or Laguna S 2.1?
Inkling scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna S 2.1 leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Inkling or Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Inkling
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling vs Kimi K3
- Inkling vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-vs-laguna-s-2-1.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling.json·/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling laguna-s-2-1(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling", "b": "laguna-s-2-1"}at/mcp, no key