Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507

Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507's 55.7 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Laguna S 2.1 C

Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 85 against 75
  • Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 26

Watch for

No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls

Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 C

Best for Agents that want a capable small instruct model on a laptop, phone-class device or spare GPU, with a plain licence and long context.

Ahead on

  • Reach, 95 against 75

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5

Watch for

No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLaguna S 2.1Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507Edge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%257595Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 +20
Risk20%205555even
Agent interface10%108575Laguna S 2.1 +10
Documentation and upkeep10%104126Laguna S 2.1 +15
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 61/100C 55.7/100

Facts side by side

FactLaguna S 2.1Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorPoolsideAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceOpenMDW-1.1Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-08-192025-09-17
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.3/5 (4)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Laguna S 2.1

A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.

Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507

A small, fast cousin for instruction following, short tool-calling jobs and long documents on modest hardware, with no thinking step. It runs in about 3 GB at 4 bits on every common runtime, and two providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes in over a year, no answers from Alibaba and no safety results.

Before you call either

Laguna S 2.1

  1. Quickest start is ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon
  2. On our reference machine try llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB
  3. With vLLM or SGLang use --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM --tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna
  4. Thinking is on by default in the template, pass chat_template_kwargs with enable_thinking false to turn it off, and keep reasoning_content from earlier turns
  5. The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add --ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality
  6. Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
  7. Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations

Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507

  1. Quickest start is ollama run qwen3:4b-instruct, 2.5 GB. Plain qwen3:4b is the Thinking-2507 edition, not this one
  2. On our reference machine use BF16 with vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes
  3. Use the hermes parser in vLLM or qwen25 in SGLang, the template emits JSON inside tool_call tags
  4. Don't pass enable_thinking, this edition never thinks and the card says the flag isn't needed
  5. Sampling per the card is temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and min_p 0, with presence_penalty up to 2 against repetition
  6. Drop the context to 32,768 tokens if memory runs out, as the card suggests
  7. Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507?

Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507's 55.7 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach.

Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.