Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
Laguna S 2.1 and Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want Qwen3.8-27B's skills with shorter thinking, for teams under US$1M revenue or research.
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 75
Watch for
Commercial use above US$1M gross annual revenue needs a separate licence
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 80 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna S 2.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Laguna S 2.1 +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 43 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue with a separate Swift Enterprise License above it. Built on Qwen3.8-27B, whose Apache 2.0 still governs the base |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and agent work with images in, that fits a 24 GB machine with UkisAI's own 4-bit builds. Commercial use is free only below US$1M revenue. The main risks are that nobody at UkisAI answers its discussions, and that the shorter thinking rests on UkisAI's own benchmarks.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 18.4 GB with the vision projector - On our reference machine BF16 fits,
vllm serve ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27b --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - The template is Qwen3.8-27B's, so
chat_template_kwargswithreasoning_effortlow, medium or xhigh (default) andenable_thinkingfalse work as on the base - UkisAI benchmarked it at temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 0, which is a reasonable starting point
- The MLX 4-bit build needs UkisAI's patched MLX-LM and has no image or video chat
- Check the licence before commercial use, it stops at US$1M gross annual revenue including affiliates
- MTP self-speculative decoding is available with the base's head, flags on the card
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B?
Laguna S 2.1 and Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key