Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
Laguna S 2.1 and Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 41
Watch for
Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna S 2.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Laguna S 2.1 +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 56 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Jackrong |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images - The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and
--spec-type draft-mtpin llama.cpp - The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
- For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
- reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
- Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
- Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2?
Laguna S 2.1 and Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2"}at/mcp, no key