Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
LFM3-Omni-2B and Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Voice and camera agents on a laptop or phone that want one small model for hearing, seeing, speaking and calling tools
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
Watch for
Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release
Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a Qwen3.8-27B tuned for shorter reasoning, for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 80
- Risk, 50 against 40
Watch for
Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +10
LFM3-Omni-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, nothing from the repository runs. Provenance 5 of 15, the files are on a personal account with no site or organisation behind it, though every file has a checksum. Safety evaluation 0, the card says none was done. Agent guidance 5, general cautions about loops and tool reliability. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no contact or policy.
Agent interface LFM3-Omni-2B +10
LFM3-Omni-2B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (13,513 characters), with roles, images, video and audio, tools, deferred tools and tool results. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card documents tool calling from spoken or written requests. Structured output 0, the card doesn't mention JSON or structured output for this model. Reasoning control 0, the card says this is a non-reasoning model and that enable_thinking=True is not supported, so there is no thinking to turn off or budget. Context 5, 32K tokens of input and output per the card. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 70.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 60
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, only the template shows the Hermes-style JSON calls, which differ from the base's format. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the switches are documented but not where the reasoning comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens from the base.
Reach Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +5
LFM3-Omni-2B 80
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.29 GB projector file, and 1.39 GB × 1.2 = 1.7 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 10, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture with the LFM3 vision and audio projectors and speech output (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242, with a realtime client example), and Ollama's library has an lfm3-omni entry. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-omni-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 80.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 85
Memory 25 of 30, Jackrong's IQ4_XS GGUF is 15.4 GB, about 18.5 GB with a fifth added, which fits 24 GB. Runtimes 20, it keeps Qwen3.8-27B's architecture, which released vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run, while Ollama's entry is the base's, not this model's. Builds 15, GGUFs at many precisions from 4-bit to 8-bit and BF16. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 through the chain. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no provider serves it.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-Omni-2B | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 85 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 50 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 60 | LFM3-Omni-2B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 49 | 51 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-Omni-2B | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Jackrong |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LFM3-Omni-2B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM3-Omni-2B
One 2.17B model that sees, listens and talks on an 8 GB machine and turns spoken requests into tool calls. Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release. The context is 32K, it doesn't reason, Liquid hasn't answered a question on the repository, and there are no safety results or data sources.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.
Before you call either
LFM3-Omni-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-Omni-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-omni - Greedy decoding for text. For speech use audio_temperature 0.4 and audio_repetition_penalty 1.2, per the card
- The context is 32K, and llama.cpp samples video at 2 frames a second up to 384 frames
- Parse tool calls yourself from the XML it returns
- It doesn't reason, so don't pass enable_thinking
- Validate JSON output yourself
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images - The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and
--spec-type draft-mtpin llama.cpp - The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
- For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
- reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
- Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
- Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-Omni-2B or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2?
LFM3-Omni-2B and Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-Omni-2B or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Arete-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Carbon-X vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kronos vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kronos vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-omni-2b-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-omni-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-omni-2b qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-omni-2b", "b": "qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2"}at/mcp, no key