Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
LFM3-Omni-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Voice and camera agents on a laptop or phone that want one small model for hearing, seeing, speaking and calling tools
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 65
- Risk, 40 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 49 against 37
Watch for
Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls and can live with its use policy
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
230 GB in FP8, and about 155 GB for the smallest 4-bit library build, more than a 128 GB machine
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach LFM3-Omni-2B +15
LFM3-Omni-2B 80
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.29 GB projector file, and 1.39 GB × 1.2 = 1.7 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 10, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture with the LFM3 vision and audio projectors and speech output (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242, with a realtime client example), and Ollama's library has an lfm3-omni entry. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-omni-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 80.
MiniMax-M2.5 65
Memory earns 5. MiniMax only publishes its 230 GB FP8 release, and the smallest build of 4-bit or better from a runtime's own library is LM Studio's MLX 4-bit at 128.7 GB, about 154 GB with the fifth added, so it needs more than our 107.4 GB machine and fits within 256 GB. Runtimes earn the full 25, with model code in released vLLM v0.33.0, SGLang v0.5.23, llama.cpp and Transformers, an LM Studio catalogue entry, and Ollama 0.40.14, whose pinned llama.cpp b11963 has the minimax-m2 architecture, though Ollama's library lists no build. Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision, the FP8 release. Terms earn 10 for a custom licence that allows free commercial use under a use policy. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 5, since Novita and Featherless AI serve it through Hugging Face, while MiniMax's own API is closed to new users and retires it on 18 November 2026. 5+25+10+10+10+5 = 65.
Documentation and upkeep LFM3-Omni-2B +12
LFM3-Omni-2B 49
Model card 14, Intended use (one on-device model in place of separate speech recognition, vision, language and speech models), architecture, parameters (2.17B), context (32K) and the text and speech languages. Training data 5, the card has no training section. Last change 20, the last commit, on 3 November 2026, changed the card's navigation icons, seven days before this check, and the one before it, on 28 October, documented video frame rate and frame limits. Responsiveness 0, none of the 12 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 October to 9 November 2026) has a reply from a LiquidAI member. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 5, the card gives a 32K context while config.json gives the language model 128,000 positions and Liquid's API lists 128,000 for the hosted model, so the card and the files don't agree on context. 14 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 49.
MiniMax-M2.5 37
The model card earns 2, stating only intended use and leaving out limitations, architecture, parameters, context, natural languages and a cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description with no cut-off. The last change earns 20, a card edit on 26 October 2026 (commit 2515a3ea, a link renamed from MiniMax Agent to MiniMax Code), 9 days before this check; the files, template and code are unchanged since February. Responsiveness earns 5, with a MiniMax reply in 2 of the 40 most recent discussions and none since April. Version policy earns 5, since earlier and later models sit in their own repositories without dated notes. File health earns nothing, because the card's licence metadata still contradicts the licence in the files and an FP8 output report still waits without a reply. 2+5+20+5+5+0 = 37.
Risk LFM3-Omni-2B +10
LFM3-Omni-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
MiniMax-M2.5 30
File safety earns 15, safetensors only with no pickle files, less 10 because every documented loading route passes trust_remote_code for the repository's Python. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation MiniMax links to with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, as MiniMax publishes neither. Licence risk earns nothing (read 21 October 2026). The Prohibited Uses Policy goes beyond the law, MiniMax can end the licence for any breach and replaced its terms three weeks after release, and that change on 6 March 2026 came with no dated note while the card still links to a deleted file. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy, SECURITY.md or advisories, and only a general contact address on the card.
Agent interface MiniMax-M2.5 +5
LFM3-Omni-2B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (13,513 characters), with roles, images, video and audio, tools, deferred tools and tool results. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card documents tool calling from spoken or written requests. Structured output 0, the card doesn't mention JSON or structured output for this model. Reasoning control 0, the card says this is a non-reasoning model and that enable_thinking=True is not supported, so there is no thinking to turn off or budget. Context 5, 32K tokens of input and output per the card. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 70.
MiniMax-M2.5 75
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, as MiniMax's own guide documents how tools go in and how calls come back, gives a parsing function, and its deployment guides name the vLLM and SGLang parsers. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several invoke blocks in one call. Structured output earns nothing, since JSON output isn't documented or claimed. Reasoning control earns nothing, because thinking is always on with no documented way to turn it off or budget it. Context earns 10 for 196,608 tokens with no position scaling.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-Omni-2B | MiniMax-M2.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 65 | LFM3-Omni-2B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 30 | LFM3-Omni-2B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 75 | MiniMax-M2.5 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 49 | 37 | LFM3-Omni-2B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-Omni-2B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | MiniMax Model License (model) and modified MIT (code) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-02-12 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LFM3-Omni-2B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM3-Omni-2B
One 2.17B model that sees, listens and talks on an 8 GB machine and turns spoken requests into tool calls. Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release. The context is 32K, it doesn't reason, Liquid hasn't answered a question on the repository, and there are no safety results or data sources.
MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is a 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent work, with parallel tool calls, a 196K context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4-GPU server for FP8 or about 155 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risk is a licence replaced after release with a Prohibited Uses Policy while the card still says modified MIT.
Before you call either
LFM3-Omni-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-Omni-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-omni - Greedy decoding for text. For speech use audio_temperature 0.4 and audio_repetition_penalty 1.2, per the card
- The context is 32K, and llama.cpp samples video at 2 frames a second up to 384 frames
- Parse tool calls yourself from the XML it returns
- It doesn't reason, so don't pass enable_thinking
- Validate JSON output yourself
MiniMax-M2.5
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache
- On a single large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.5 lists a Q4_K_M GGUF of 138 GB and an MLX 4-bit of 129 GB (Mac only), and LM Studio states 121 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends
- Budget output tokens for thinking on every turn, since the template always opens a think block
- Read LICENSE-MODEL, not the card's licence link, before shipping, and keep the required Notice text in every copy
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita or Featherless AI; MiniMax's own API retires M2.5 on 18 November 2026
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-Omni-2B or MiniMax-M2.5?
LFM3-Omni-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with LFM3-Omni-2B or MiniMax-M2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Arete-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kronos vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-omni-2b-vs-minimax-m2-5.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-omni-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-5.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-omni-2b minimax-m2-5(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-omni-2b", "b": "minimax-m2-5"}at/mcp, no key