Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 57.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls and can live with its use policy
Ahead on
- Capability, 73 against 50
Watch for
230 GB in FP8, and about 155 GB for the smallest 4-bit library build, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 65
- Risk, 80 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 22
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 73 | 50 | MiniMax-M2.5 +23 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 90 | Muse Glimmer 30B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 80 | Muse Glimmer 30B +50 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 22 | 65 | Muse Glimmer 30B +43 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.5/100 | BB 70/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax Model License (model) and modified MIT (code) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-02-12 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is a 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent work, with parallel tool calls, a 196K context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4-GPU server for FP8 or about 155 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risk is a licence replaced after release with a Prohibited Uses Policy while the card still says modified MIT.
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.5
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache
- On a single large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.5 lists a Q4_K_M GGUF of 138 GB and an MLX 4-bit of 129 GB (Mac only), and LM Studio states 121 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends
- Budget output tokens for thinking on every turn, since the template always opens a think block
- Read LICENSE-MODEL, not the card's licence link, before shipping, and keep the required Notice text in every copy
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita or Featherless AI; MiniMax's own API retires M2.5 on 18 November 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.5 or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.5's 57.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.5 leads on capability.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.5 or Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-5 muse-glimmer-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-5", "b": "muse-glimmer-30b"}at/mcp, no key