Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against occamy-1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. occamy-1.0 leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Risk, 80 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 65
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Glimmer 30B | occamy-1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 80 | 55 | Muse Glimmer 30B +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 65 | 74 | occamy-1.0 +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Glimmer 30B | occamy-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meta | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Before you call either
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Glimmer 30B or occamy-1.0?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against occamy-1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. occamy-1.0 leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B or occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-occamy-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-glimmer-30b occamy-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-glimmer-30b", "b": "occamy-1-0"}at/mcp, no key