Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against occamy-1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B B
Best for Agents on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a fast tool-calling reasoning model with long context and a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
Watch for
No safety evaluation results published
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | occamy-1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 55 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 70 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 70 | 74 | occamy-1.0 +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | occamy-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-11 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
A small agent cousin, 3B active parameters, with trained parallel tool calls, a thinking switch and up to 1M tokens of context, under a permissive licence. It runs in about 23 GB from the GGUF or Ollama builds, and NVIDIA's NVFP4 build needs NVIDIA GPUs. The main risks are no published safety results and one answered question across two repositories.
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Before you call either
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning, about 19 to 25 GB of files depending on the platform - On the reference machine use
llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_0 --jinja, since the card's Q4_K_M tag doesn't exist there and NVFP4 needs NVIDIA GPUs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, which vLLM's nemotron_v3 parser reads so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Go past 262,144 tokens only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576) and enough memory
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or occamy-1.0?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against occamy-1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b-vs-occamy-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b.json·/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b occamy-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b", "b": "occamy-1-0"}at/mcp, no key