Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B B

Best for Agents on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a fast tool-calling reasoning model with long context and a permissive licence

Ahead on

  • Capability, 34 against 28
  • Reach, 85 against 75
  • Agent interface, 90 against 35
  • Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 52

Watch for

No safety evaluation results published

Olmo 3 7B Think D

Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BOlmo 3 7B ThinkEdge
Capability35%353428Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +6
Reach25%258575Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +10
Risk20%207575even
Agent interface10%109035Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +55
Documentation and upkeep10%107052Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +18
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 64.2/100D 52.3/100

Facts side by side

FactNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BOlmo 3 7B Think
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorNVIDIAAi2 (Allen Institute for AI)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceOpenMDW-1.1Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-08-112026-06-25
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

A small agent cousin, 3B active parameters, with trained parallel tool calls, a thinking switch and up to 1M tokens of context, under a permissive licence. It runs in about 23 GB from the GGUF or Ollama builds, and NVIDIA's NVFP4 build needs NVIDIA GPUs. The main risks are no published safety results and one answered question across two repositories.

Olmo 3 7B Think

A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.

Before you call either

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

  1. Quickest start is ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning, about 19 to 25 GB of files depending on the platform
  2. On the reference machine use llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_0 --jinja, since the card's Q4_K_M tag doesn't exist there and NVFP4 needs NVIDIA GPUs
  3. With vLLM serve it with --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder (SGLang uses --reasoning-parser nemotron_3)
  4. Use temperature=1.0 and top_p=0.95, as the card says
  5. Thinking is on by default. Pass chat_template_kwargs with enable_thinking false for short tasks
  6. For coding agents pass force_nonempty_content: true in chat_template_kwargs, which vLLM's nemotron_v3 parser reads so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content
  7. Go past 262,144 tokens only with the card's flags (VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1, --max-model-len 1048576) and enough memory

Olmo 3 7B Think

  1. Quickest start is ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB
  2. With vLLM, vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend
  3. Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
  4. Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
  5. Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
  6. For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
  7. A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
  8. Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Olmo 3 7B Think?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Olmo 3 7B Think

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.