Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
Olmo 3 7B Think scores 52.3 (D) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 35
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 35
- Risk, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 52 against 46
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Olmo 3 7B Think +40
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
Olmo 3 7B Think 75
Memory earns the full 30, since Ollama's 4-bit build is 4.5 GB and fits 8 GB (per the 21 October check of Ollama's library). Runtimes earn 25, with released llama.cpp (b11963), Ollama (v0.40.14, pinning b11963), vLLM, LM Studio and Transformers all running it. Builds earn nothing, because Ai2 publishes no quantised build of its own. Terms earn 10, since the card binds Apache 2.0 to Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, a use policy. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns nothing, as the Hub's provider mapping is empty and Ai2 has no API for it. 30 + 25 + 0 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +40
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
Olmo 3 7B Think 35
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, since only the template and vLLM's own parser describe it. Trained tool calling earns nothing, because Ai2's report says tool calling was trained into the Instruct model, not Think. Structured output earns nothing. Reasoning control earns nothing, since it always thinks. Context earns 5 for 65,536 tokens trained. 20 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 35.
Risk Olmo 3 7B Think +15
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
Olmo 3 7B Think 75
File safety earns 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs. Provenance earns 15, files in the allenai organisation Ai2 links to, with a checksum for every file. Safety evaluation earns 20, as Ai2 publishes its safety results and the OLMES harness to rerun them. Agent guidance earns 5 for the card's general cautions. Licence risk earns 5, losing 5 for disallowed uses beyond the law and 5 because Ai2 can update the guidelines and end access at its discretion. The security programme earns 5 for a reporting route, a security.txt now past its expiry and a channel for security concerns in the guidelines, with no public advisories. 25 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 75.
Documentation and upkeep Olmo 3 7B Think +6
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
Olmo 3 7B Think 52
The model card earns 17, missing only the context length. Training data earns the full 20, as every dataset is released with sources and sizes. The last change earns 10, a card fix on 25 June 2026, within 180 days. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no Ai2 reply among the 4 replies in the discussions. Version policy earns 5, with earlier and later models in their own repositories and no dated notes. File health earns nothing, because the template's default prompt contradicts the card's on the cut-off and a stray swap file and an unanswered report sit in the repository. 17 + 20 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 52.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | Olmo 3 7B Think | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 35 | LongCat-2.5 +40 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 52 | Olmo 3 7B Think +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | Olmo 3 7B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | 2024-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-02-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning model for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or Olmo 3 7B Think?
Olmo 3 7B Think scores 52.3 (D) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Mistral Large 4 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 olmo-3-7b-think(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "olmo-3-7b-think"}at/mcp, no key